me: "oh cool, I think I get how git works now! let's try out the github desktop app" me 5 seconds later, making a small change to a blog post: [somehow 404s the main list of posts]
-
-
this is exactly how I learned it and Terrifying Smart Coder
@jordansissel confirmed that it is the Canon Way -
I'm kind of a crazy Unix person, I saw git being created, I think I understand its internal model, and I still had to write out a whole series of blog posts I'm actually not entirely sure I still understand. (Don't ask me all the ways to specify revisions & ranges, either. Augh.)
-
'reflog then cherry-pick the thing i committed to the wrong branch into the right branch because i'm a fucking dolt' should just be a single command, based on my usage pattern
-
git shove tbh
-
git gud never executed for me :(
-
oh i was just saying what i thought the operation should be called somebody else has already used it for something else of course
-
Hi I'm just here to evangelize about
@pijul_org, which works the way everyone expects git to work when they first encounter it. (Although still in beta, and the Github equivalent is rather nascent).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Eesh, the trouble with git is that you have to learn more about the inner workings of it than you really ought to need. In particular, there's really no clean separation between "porcelain" and "plumbing" commands, although the implied reference to toilets is quite telling.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.