it's not an example of a good proposal, it's an example of a harmless one that's inside the parameters
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @argumatronic
(if we were attempting to address The Incel Problem it'd be increasing representation of less attractive women that i could conceivably think is useful)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
i have never read an incel forum where that was what they were asking for, so i feel a bit like you're motte-and-baileying. sure, that could be a net positive thing to do and within the realm of "redistribution of sex" but that's surely not what anyone is actually asking for.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @argumatronic
oh whoof i'm not saying we should give incels anything they say they want. i'm just mad at people reading robin hanson going "by redistribution i mean anything that changes the distribution" and responding with "redistribution means confiscation to me so you mean rape"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
but surely when people talk about redistributing income (to alleviate income inequality) the typical reading is "confiscating income" albeit generally via the tax code; i think he's written about this as well that "redistribution" means confiscation.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @argumatronic
Chaos Retweeted Robin Hanson
yeah it's for sure helping lots that "redistribution" has meant confiscation and handouts in US politics for a cool century. the relevant tweet:https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/990259534923956225 …
Chaos added,
Robin HansonVerified account @robinhanson"Redistribution" means "change the distribution". A great many who have commented can't imagine any policy options to change the distribution of sex access other than rape and slavery, and so accuse me of advocating such things. But a great many other policy options exist.Show this thread1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
i mean, i just flat out don't want "policy options" regarding sex and people's sex lives, but particularly not from him and for this particular reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @argumatronic
there's a lot to be said for that position and i'd love it if we rejecting hearing from him on that basis, not the basis of a game of Outrage Telephone
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
oh my objection to your original tweet tho is that i think people are precisely right about what he meant and he just didn't like getting called out for it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @argumatronic
gotta say i doubt that, i think the other contretemps of his hints at where he's really going, which is the same tired ass "let's roll back the sexual revolution because forced monogamy was so good you guys" as all the Unwin-heads are into and Douthat picked up on
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Chaos Retweeted Chaos
Chaos added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.