. . . to view abstractions as social plays and there's nothing to be done about it but avoid letting your threatening abstractions leak to the MOPs. Once it's out, defending it as an *idea* is pointless, because the MOPs aren't interacting to an idea but to a social danger.
-
-
Dunno. I could make an argument for the opposite, at least insofar as I'd include Zelazny in pomo culture. (Though perhaps that more post-structuralist, which opens a whole new can of cliches.)
-
speaking of which, what should I try of Zelazny's if I found Nine Princes bad due to there being nobody in the book I didn't want dead
-
I quit after 40 pages
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
java is fine once you hack strong types into it
-
pomo + typing when
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
