I don't think you can avoid a thing that can only exist in the bizarre imagination of counterparty. It's like trying to pacify a jealous boyfriend.
-
-
I strongly doubt it exists, but the important feature that makes me aggressively disregard the concept of micro-aggression is that it is impossible to disprove those 10%'s existence, making it like Russel's Teapot, or grandma's multiple peculiarly conflicted supernaturals
-
they're not unfalsifiable, they're just unfalsifiable to a hostile interlocutor
-
You can say that about Psi too, methinks. Even easier with Psi, I'd argue.
-
lol, the psi excuse is "my hypothesis was falsified because of the hostile observer", kinda the inverse akshully
-
Psi is my "the Universe is not required to be consistent just because I think it is" exception. No test conducted by neutral observers has yet produced replicable and reliable evidence of Psi powers. I accept that. However, I don't accept that that means they don't exist.
-
I mean, call me Blaise if you must, but I have seen phenomena with my own eyes that I am satisfied cannot be explained by the laws of physics as we know them. I cannot replicate them. The most parsimonious explanation, of course, is that I am mistaken about what I saw.
-
we need a new thread for weird story time
-
the best crazy shit i've seen unfortunately has an obvious, if neurologically fascinating, parsimonious explanation (if you wake up suddenly enough during REM you will vividly hallucinate whatever you were looking at in your dream, briefly until your retinas adjust)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
