'This evil is impolite and without the facade of niceness' is not a super awesome selling point for evil, ijs
-
-
Replying to @palecur
fair, but I guess what I'm trying to say is that brutalism is fully capable of human-scale architecture and spaces designed for people, the problem is evil architecture itself, not the style that removes the ornamentation that allowed us to ignore it. Don't shoot the messenger.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @hikikomorphism
what if the messenger remains ugly and depressing to behold (much like my posting :| )
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @palecur
I'm going to go find some examples of beautiful and livable brutalist built environments and come back to you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hikikomorphism
my foresight indicates that they won't look brutalist
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @palecur
This might be hard to define but to me brutalist architecture is about foregrounding and celebrating functional elements instead of hiding them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hikikomorphism
that actually sounds nice, but my impression is that it's much more about buildings that look like ugly slabs and prioritizing cliffs of concrete over *having* functional elements.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @palecur @hikikomorphism
like, functional elements *should* and *can be* beautiful! Gaudi was incapable of not making a building that was both.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @palecur @hikikomorphism
how about if for every brutalist skyscraper i get you get one art nouveau skyscraper
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @hikikomorphism
make it art deco and you have a deal
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
all right, you twisted my arm
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.