hunh, that goalpost was just on "effective" and now it's way the heck over there, how did that happen
-
-
I figured you’d land here. Redefining “effective” was pretty much your only rhetorical move.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
actual lol
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Redefining effective basically mean “didn’t die immediately” or “successfully did a thing” is hardly where I’d want to end up
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
k. ask a swimming coach whether an effective swimmer is a terribly smart swimmer or a swimmer who absorbs and replicates what is institutionally known to be the best procedure for swimming
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ask a swimming coach how many effective swimmers who can take this kind of instruction have a below 70 IQ
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
your categorization of IQ 71 as "smart" shows what a generous soul you are
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Answer the original question
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it's not addressed to me, i am not now nor have i ever been a member of Mensa
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My apologies, by original question I meant how many <70 IQ world class swimmers there are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
how would i know? you gave that as a question for a swimming coach, not for me
-
-
I think we’ve reach our aporia here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
that was a while ago. be sure to let me know how being clever works out for you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.