My original statement was that intelligence is a necessary but not sufficient condition for effectiveness. In what world is this not true?
-
-
this one, where intelligence is neither necessary nor sufficient because obediently following good procedure suffices
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
History is rich with counterexamples to this line of thought my friend.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etscrivner @chaosprime and
To find them Google “I was just following orders”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
hunh, that goalpost was just on "effective" and now it's way the heck over there, how did that happen
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I figured you’d land here. Redefining “effective” was pretty much your only rhetorical move.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
actual lol
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Redefining effective basically mean “didn’t die immediately” or “successfully did a thing” is hardly where I’d want to end up
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
k. ask a swimming coach whether an effective swimmer is a terribly smart swimmer or a swimmer who absorbs and replicates what is institutionally known to be the best procedure for swimming
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Ask a swimming coach how many effective swimmers who can take this kind of instruction have a below 70 IQ
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
your categorization of IQ 71 as "smart" shows what a generous soul you are
-
-
Answer the original question
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it's not addressed to me, i am not now nor have i ever been a member of Mensa
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.