There is something bizarre about “high-IQ” as an identity core like with Mensa. Like a trade union of capitalists or a commune of libertarians. Or that South Park joke about the anti-semitic sect of Judaism. Shouldn’t you be winning Nobels, rather than performing identity?
-
-
Not the same thing, but one is arguably the precondition for the other.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
no, you can be super effective if you're highly pedagogically compliant & either have good intuition for who to be pedagogically compliant to or are lucky in developing in an environment full of well-curated institutional knowledge so you can be pedagogically compliant to anybody
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Sounds like you’re just saying “smart” in a more complicated fashion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
not really, no, unless you're using a similarly circular definition of "smart" that turns out to encompass anything "effective". you can be very much not anything anybody actually means by "smart" and meet the criteria i describe
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
My original statement was that intelligence is a necessary but not sufficient condition for effectiveness. In what world is this not true?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
this one, where intelligence is neither necessary nor sufficient because obediently following good procedure suffices
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
History is rich with counterexamples to this line of thought my friend.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @etscrivner @chaosprime and
To find them Google “I was just following orders”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
hunh, that goalpost was just on "effective" and now it's way the heck over there, how did that happen
-
-
I figured you’d land here. Redefining “effective” was pretty much your only rhetorical move.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
actual lol
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.