hunh. well, theologians like to talk about supernatural/extranatural stuff in this context, which might be anything or nothing, but not that many of the non-nothing cases would much give a shit about the theologians' work
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @sage_like_grace
then you have actual gods, which are emergent phenomena in social behavior, which theologians mostly avoid talking about but philosophers discuss sometimes. when theologians do talk about them, it's usually to try to identify them with supernatural/extranatural stuff
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @sage_like_grace
those exist in social pattern space so the work of the theologians and philosophers is relevant to them, though "determine" would be a strong word. if you piss in the river, you're involved in the waterfall, but saying you determine it would be a bit much
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @sage_like_grace
the theologians' and philosophers' work is part of the phenomenon of gods determining things about themselves, which is mostly real wacky shit like a five-year-old determining he's Superboy
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
it's unclear if there's any way for us to know whether gods are conscious but i suspect they are, and that they have very slow, fuzzy, incoherent qualia
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.