who knows? I mean, you are hypothesizin about what strong believers of an abrahamic faith that don't have that power would do if they had that power. Like, there's only one way to find out, but it gonna be bad
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @0knaomi and
it would start with throwing things, not beating. beating is more intimate, it's something you do to discipline the ingroup, throwing things is better for designating outgroup
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @chaosprime and
this isn't nearly reductive enough, why don't we start talking about what would happen if 80% of the population were believers in abrahamic faiths instead
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @hikikomorphism and
i'm not refusing to answer anything? part of it is it depends on what "christian" we're talking about. like you know how there's Racist1 and Racist2 and Racist3? well there's definitely Christian1 and Christian2 and Christian3
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @hikikomorphism and
oh, if we're doubling the christians we have now then we'd be full Gilead in a hot minute, that would push the absolute freaks way past critical mass
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
beating women in the street may or may not be on the menu, especially as there will be a cultural imperative to differentiate from the outgroup (y'know, like "we don't eat pig because that's what the guys over the hill have on their feast days"), but the horror will be as bad
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.