How so, specifically? It seems like the only important difference is that in the US such people have much less power, absent that it's just an ingroup/outgroup distinction between our conservative commentators and their radical clerics
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @0knaomi and
they don't have the power to do so, but some (likely from the same groups who support the death penalty for abortion) would absolutely attempt to enforce modesty codes if they had the ability to do so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @hikikomorphism and
who knows? I mean, you are hypothesizin about what strong believers of an abrahamic faith that don't have that power would do if they had that power. Like, there's only one way to find out, but it gonna be bad
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @0knaomi and
it would start with throwing things, not beating. beating is more intimate, it's something you do to discipline the ingroup, throwing things is better for designating outgroup
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @turrible_tao @chaosprime and
this isn't nearly reductive enough, why don't we start talking about what would happen if 80% of the population were believers in abrahamic faiths instead
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
i'm not refusing to answer anything? part of it is it depends on what "christian" we're talking about. like you know how there's Racist1 and Racist2 and Racist3? well there's definitely Christian1 and Christian2 and Christian3
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.