whether he is EXACTLY like some crazy islamic shitstain or slightly better is a bit like arguing about whether rat piss tastes better than cat piss
it would start with throwing things, not beating. beating is more intimate, it's something you do to discipline the ingroup, throwing things is better for designating outgroup
-
-
do you think the US gov, if eighty percent of its voters were christian would "throw things" at woman who wore skirts yes or no
-
this isn't nearly reductive enough, why don't we start talking about what would happen if 80% of the population were believers in abrahamic faiths instead
-
half the country are already christians, why cant you guys answer simple concrete questions about if there were more of the people that already exist in large amounts and if they would be as bad as ppl who publicly cane woman
-
i'm not refusing to answer anything? part of it is it depends on what "christian" we're talking about. like you know how there's Racist1 and Racist2 and Racist3? well there's definitely Christian1 and Christian2 and Christian3
-
take the people that exist here now, and fucking double them
-
oh, if we're doubling the christians we have now then we'd be full Gilead in a hot minute, that would push the absolute freaks way past critical mass
-
beating women in the street may or may not be on the menu, especially as there will be a cultural imperative to differentiate from the outgroup (y'know, like "we don't eat pig because that's what the guys over the hill have on their feast days"), but the horror will be as bad
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.