I STILL bet you could do it without "ew poor people" undertones. I mean, you're pretty good at words. All the gross poor people that take public transportation already know how many/what kind of problems there are... But it's a thing the non-silver-spoon-fed need, so... 
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @0Kultra @chaosprime
I've experienced the utter joys of public transit myself and I don't disagree with any of this. But anyone aiming to be in charge of it and improve it, maybe *they* should take the time and care to phrase their disdain a little less aggressively.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
seems fair, one wants to be clear that one's contempt is for the poor level of service, not for the people who must endure the poor level of service
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
it can be viewed as a level of service issue, though, when the number of riders packed into the same can (and therefore the number of people who can have their shit fucked up by a single rider) is considered a part of that... individual pods having a way different profile on it
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
sure. i mean, somebody is always going to be negative six sigmas on "housetrained". right now we deal with that by shoving them onto a bus and calling that fine because the bus is for people who can't afford to drive so who cares what they have to deal with?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 4 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.