every 'anti-anti-consumerist' argument characterizes anti-consumerism as 'not liking when people buy things'. it's not an impressive rhetorical move and if i thought that was what anti-consumerism was, i'd think it was stupid too
-
-
oh, I'm not so sure (though obviously I've used that argument myself elsewhere). But godel's point is that no system can prove itself complete, but I think you could construct systems in which all the endpoints could be enumerated. It's like chess, chess is solvable.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
i think
@maradydd literally invented a field to explore this but the math goes from 'uh ok i think i follow' to *smile and nod acceptingly* more or less instantly for me -
* adds math to the list of 'unpatchable vulns' *
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but yeah, realistically a secure language would have to be very limited, and it would have to include some inbuilt system of authentication, otherwise the easiest exploit is just to pretend to be someone you're not.
-
by this metric i'm exploiting reality every gd day
-
well, reality was born gullible
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.