Is cannibalism wrong, immoral, or unethical if it doesn't involve people being *intentionally* killed?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @sonyaellenmann
everyone replying to this doesn't understand why it's traditionally considered "wrong" in the first place
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @alicemazzy
Why *is* it traditionally considered wrong? Avoiding prion diseases?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sonyaellenmann @alicemazzy
suppressing instrumentalization societies require that we think of each other as people, not as things, and thinking of someone as potential calories is a fairly hardcore level of thinking of them as a thing
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
yeah, that works too, but it's edging closer to the failure case as the only people who know anything about it will tell you, in social engineering you want fences around your fences
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
actual social engineering, not the cute hax0r use of the term, which would properly be called social cryptanalysis
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.