he provides a model of necessary derivation of free will of collections of particles from free will of particles, he doesn't provide a model of free will at all; his fully baseless axiom of free will could rely on many-worlds or not, the question isn't asked
oh, i see the difficulty. you're just talking about different things. Conway's assertion that free will of collections of particles implies free will of particles holds under any QM interpretation. pomo is saying free will itself can only come from many-worlds
-
-
it's like if one person is saying "liquids conform to the shape of any container that holds them" and another is saying "liquids can only be poured into cylinders". the truth of these things looks related but isn't
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.