i'm trying to think of something that has less factual illustrative power than choice of axioms and it's damned hard unless all you want illustrated is what axioms somebody likes
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
oh, i have no investment in that position and don't think it's the case, but Conway here doesn't refute it either, in the whole thing free will is just a black box hypothetical causal phenomenon whose provenance isn't raised as a question
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
he provides a model of necessary derivation of free will of collections of particles from free will of particles, he doesn't provide a model of free will at all; his fully baseless axiom of free will could rely on many-worlds or not, the question isn't asked
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
okay yeah but it doesn't reduce to "refutes"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
enh nah because it isn't speaking to the question pomo's assertion addresses at all, a many-worlds-derived free will would slot into the model as well as any other kind
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
no, you've just kept saying it, but because Conway's model doesn't say anything at all about where its free will comes from, it cannot do that because it is completely disjoint from the question
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 3 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.