i'm trying to think of something that has less factual illustrative power than choice of axioms and it's damned hard unless all you want illustrated is what axioms somebody likes
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
oh, i have no investment in that position and don't think it's the case, but Conway here doesn't refute it either, in the whole thing free will is just a black box hypothetical causal phenomenon whose provenance isn't raised as a question
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
he provides a model of necessary derivation of free will of collections of particles from free will of particles, he doesn't provide a model of free will at all; his fully baseless axiom of free will could rely on many-worlds or not, the question isn't asked
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
okay yeah but it doesn't reduce to "refutes"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
enh nah because it isn't speaking to the question pomo's assertion addresses at all, a many-worlds-derived free will would slot into the model as well as any other kind
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
and if that were in fact the only kind that could work the model remains serenely undisturbed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.