okay, fuck, i'm going to try to guess these before i image search, this is going to be so humiliating LG: Kant, NG: oh my god i just image searched him on the other one and have forgotten, um, fuck, how about Epictetus, CG: Diogenes, LN: uh idk Kierkegaard, N: um fuck it Camus
CN: lol idk Rawls, LE: hm maybe Aquinas was that stabby-looking sure why not, NE: good god uh Hayek, CE: de Sade
-
-
NG is totes Epictetus you're tooootally gonna attract the wrong element with putting him as neutral good

-
oh no gis is just fucking me up wow it really think that's Epictetus though it's all the epicness, it can't deal with it
-
gis is absolutely convinced LG is somebody called Austin Fagothey though but obvs it's Kant so at least i'm still 3/9
-
Tweet unavailable
-
no you're totally right, it is Epicurus, gis is just wrong he is! but nobody was into showing me pictures of him i guess, which is odd because the most cursory search shows he was a snappy ass dresser
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
okay, now post-gis reactions LG: lol who tf, NG: oh thank fuck i at least got one, CG: oh well and the huge gimme yeah, LN: oh cool okay, N: had no idea he was so stylin', CN: ohh snerk is that why everybody wants me to read his ass, LE: oh well that makes sense, NE: ha okay
-
CE: yaaaaay i got three that is so much better than i expected
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.