name a more catastrophic error in Western philosophy than "cogito, ergo sum". i'll wait
enh, i guess, but that crosses the line i think exists where we've overloaded a common usage term too strongly to be useful for philosophy because people's implicit associations will distort their usage no matter how hard they try to employ the jargonized meaning
-
-
O_o wait, you think LINES EXIST?!
-
oh, i meant the other "exist"
-
there are no lines, there's only the idea of lines
-
ah, you finally found the correct response to the original challenge: Platonism
-
it's a fair cop, but in the end, Socrates is to blame.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.