What’s your best argument that the world is or isn’t a simulation? Starting seed: rat brain complexity is enough for convincing simulation
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @literalbanana
the planck length and planck interval obvs real reality isn't quantized
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @literalbanana
counterpoint: the reals are a conceptual hack to describe situations where quantization is on a scale too small to matter, or to satisfy a naive idea of "smoothness"; thus any reality involving true continuity likely to be a simulation by beings w/ mathematical ideals
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @glowcoil @literalbanana
rebuttal: the basis of my position is that in my own cosmogenetic work (a pure joke compared to the Simulators', of course) i use floats when i want fidelity closer to my own experience of reality and ints when i'm being lazy or conserving resources
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
please be rational
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.