What’s your best argument that the world is or isn’t a simulation? Starting seed: rat brain complexity is enough for convincing simulation
-
-
counterpoint: the reals are a conceptual hack to describe situations where quantization is on a scale too small to matter, or to satisfy a naive idea of "smoothness"; thus any reality involving true continuity likely to be a simulation by beings w/ mathematical ideals
-
rebuttal: the basis of my position is that in my own cosmogenetic work (a pure joke compared to the Simulators', of course) i use floats when i want fidelity closer to my own experience of reality and ints when i'm being lazy or conserving resources
-
let’s be real:
-
please be rational
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why would that be obvious except for aesthetic reasons?
-
it isn't, it's just an appeal to the intuition of beings who exist at a sufficiently macro scale that quantization feels like an unnatural phenomenon to their perception
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.