just realized that when Bayesheads talk about priors it for all practical purposes might as well be short for synthetic a priori knowledge
yeah, i'd argue that if synthetic a priori knowledge isn't updated one is fuckin' bad at synthesis though
-
-
i think Kant claimed that universals had to be a priori, not that a priori had to be universal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.