yeah, i'd argue that if synthetic a priori knowledge isn't updated one is fuckin' bad at synthesis though
just realized that when Bayesheads talk about priors it for all practical purposes might as well be short for synthetic a priori knowledge
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
i think Kant claimed that universals had to be a priori, not that a priori had to be universal
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.