There are legitimate concerns about what abusers do with guns, but restricting gun access is a half-assed measure at best.
-
Show this thread
-
Quite frankly, I don't trust the state to disarm abusers and leave those who need guns armed.
4 replies 10 retweets 59 likesShow this thread -
And we should be thinking of how to construct the future as much as defend those in the present.
1 reply 1 retweet 32 likesShow this thread -
Which is why what we need is well armed far left feminist militias to provide communal defense and deal with abusers.
3 replies 1 retweet 41 likesShow this thread -
Don't disarm abusers, arm the oppressed and abused and allow us to organize to defend ourselves.
2 replies 0 retweets 25 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @deathpigeon
Don't wanna argue but my question is if abusers and state are disarmed why would oppressed need arms. Specifically meaning guns
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sharkle82
How do we disarm abusers and the state without arming ourselves?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @deathpigeon
Yeah but I'm meaning after. I just hope the end goal is not needing arms anymore.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
having them doesn't guarantee not needing them, but not having them guarantees needing them
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.