The problem is that Latin has an adjective for 'having to do with horsemen' and not for '...dragonmen'.
-
-
Now to play with linguistic drift to make it pronounceable... dracoviation?
-
and dracoviator if we're going for the Regency vibe one is forced to suspect may be intended, that's perfect
-
It's actually 1950s, but we can figure that term would have solidified its spelling in the Regency.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.