it seems dumb on the face of it, but in the intended chain of events is only the cop who kills the guy for being homeless violating the NAP?
but, like, the intended result of the signal boosting is person becomes unemployable > becomes unemployed > becomes homeless > dies
-
-
so i'm trying to make sure i know why it actually isn't a violation of the NAP in a non-UBI society that kills its poor
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.