http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/07/29/against-signal-boosting-as-doxxing/#comment-528745 … "Screen-capping someone being an ass is a violation of the NAP" I wish I could say we'd reached peak stupid, but...
it seems dumb on the face of it, but in the intended chain of events is only the cop who kills the guy for being homeless violating the NAP?
-
-
doesn't seem like "it's okay to murder people as long as they die at the end of a sufficiently unreliable Rube Goldberg machine" will work
-
uh, I'm not sure at all what this has to do with the SSC comment I linked
-
the comment is saying the signal-boosting is a clear violation of the NAP, which is certainly hilarious for the "clear" part
-
but, like, the intended result of the signal boosting is person becomes unemployable > becomes unemployed > becomes homeless > dies
-
this is roughly as plausible as claiming that me linking that comment violated the NAP because the poster might be horribly depressed, ...
-
...see the snark and cross a tipping point inevitably leading to suicide.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.