An AI that's monitoring the entire human population of the planet is more vulnerable to Basilisks than any individual human it watches.
-
-
Replying to @PomoPsiOp
The more data you input, the more avenues you have for complex informational threats.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chaosprime
No. I also have only read a few short stories by Peter Watts. Blindsight and all those cool books I'm supposed to have read, Haven't.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PomoPsiOp
*nodnod* crazy strong recommend. i haven't read Blindsight yet either, but i own it so that's progress right
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime
The one short story I did read though, I didn't agree with the premise. "Intelligence = aggression." it's a hip idea, but I don't buy it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PomoPsiOp @chaosprime
To me it sounds like it relies on a very mammalian idea of what exactly aggression means.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
it seems to me to more rely on the idea "utility functions will be designed by idiots who have never read a science fiction story" but 6of1
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.