i have seen Spicer's statements defended on the grounds that Zyklon-B wasn't a "chemical weapon", it was a "pesticide"
-
-
-
the math is left as an exercise for the interested student
-
It isn't a weapon and it isn't a war crime if it isn't used on the front. Of course, WWI made it so that there really is no "front" anymore.
-
that doesn't seem unreasonable for "war crime" but that would be a remarkably novel usage of "weapon"
-
"It's like a mortar only you don't have to aim it."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.