How much stronger and louder did her message have to be? I blame the receivers because of the incompetence they chose over it.
she's a superbly staunch ally of the finance sector and the war industry, though. but yes, yes he is.
-
-
maybe if she hadn't balked at the unbelievable unrealism of telling people they're worth $15/hr we wouldn't have him.
-
twitter isn't the forum to have detailed discussion of her hawkishness, how the $ sector has to be involved in its fix, & wages
-
i'm sure that's correct. do you see how declining the incredibly milquetoast incrementalism of Fight For 15 sent a message?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
oh...that's such bs. And it tells me that you did not understand her message....
-
do you know the campaign's organizing principle for it? i do. it was "ladders of opportunity".
-
do i have to explain what a monumentally failed choice of metaphor that is?
-
clearly it failed with enough. But those three words weren't the totality of her platform or detailed plans.
-
sure. but to the extent there was a central narrative at all (another major problem), for the economy they were it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When the "movers & shakers" in the $ sector have that much influence, trying to establish control w/out their input is folly...
-
...pick their brains & implement a plan that can work to protect the middle class. Instead we have Trumpster deregulation.
-
i'm certain that your spectacularly charitable view of the relationship of the D establishment to finance does you credit.
-
Oh, I'm not so sanguine about the Dem establishment, but I heard HRC's positions, and they were NOT in bed with the sector.
-
i'm sure that opinions on the matter may legitimately vary.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.