*nodnod* that's certainly worth taking pause over, but there are all kinds of countervailing effects going on
maybe, but i don't think it's workable any more because it's a strategy of passivity
-
-
the right has been encouraging the left to strategies of passivity at every turn and it's basically worked and gutted them
-
opting for passivity in nearly any way at this point is pretty much just putting one's neck in the noose on one's own
-
Tweet unavailable
-
perfectly likely to be the case. but imo it's not violence that's important, it's breaking the pattern where the right has
-
been telling the story "the left will cede the monopoly on violence to us" and the left has been buying it.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
i dunno, we seem to just let the righties do violence because it's *on brand* for them
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.