why not?
-
-
Replying to @rechelon @chaosprime and
being a moral realist in no way obliges me to commit to intuitive results.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon @chaosprime and
but note even with multiple strong attractors in a dance there's still objective *structure* to ethics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
sure, that makes sense, the set of things people will select as "oughts" is presumably deterministic
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
thus moral realism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon @chaosprime and
the objectivity here is that we're talking about minds in general & abstracting from starting context
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
still all i'm getting out of this is a conversation that goes something like:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @rechelon and
nihilism: nothing is inherently better than anything else!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chaosprime @rechelon and
rechelon: there are definitely going to be more of these sorts of choices about betterness!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
i wanted to follow up on this with how i handle the problems of nihilism: http://metanihilism.com/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.