well but if you were handed/read the argument/path from here to there you'd then value it.
-
-
okay, now *that's* begging a question
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
how? definition of global attractor
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the existence of the global attractor is the question! and why would there only be one?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
it's a very rare randomly system that is perfectly balanced to have two
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
certainly you're not going to tell me that the attractor that has the most proximal states is the best
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
why not?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon @chaosprime and
being a moral realist in no way obliges me to commit to intuitive results.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon @chaosprime and
but note even with multiple strong attractors in a dance there's still objective *structure* to ethics
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
sure, that makes sense, the set of things people will select as "oughts" is presumably deterministic
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
that so many of them will clearly involve wiping out different "oughts" seems not very convergey
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.