okay then, when we get to the thing where the answer is "because i just do", that's the arbitrary value
certainly you're not going to tell me that the attractor that has the most proximal states is the best
-
-
why not?
-
being a moral realist in no way obliges me to commit to intuitive results.
-
but note even with multiple strong attractors in a dance there's still objective *structure* to ethics
-
sure, that makes sense, the set of things people will select as "oughts" is presumably deterministic
-
thus moral realism.
-
the objectivity here is that we're talking about minds in general & abstracting from starting context
-
still all i'm getting out of this is a conversation that goes something like:
-
nihilism: nothing is inherently better than anything else!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.