what is the thing about which i cannot ask "but why do you value this thing over another"?
the existence of the global attractor is the question! and why would there only be one?
-
-
it's a very rare randomly system that is perfectly balanced to have two
-
certainly you're not going to tell me that the attractor that has the most proximal states is the best
-
why not?
-
being a moral realist in no way obliges me to commit to intuitive results.
-
but note even with multiple strong attractors in a dance there's still objective *structure* to ethics
-
sure, that makes sense, the set of things people will select as "oughts" is presumably deterministic
-
thus moral realism.
-
the objectivity here is that we're talking about minds in general & abstracting from starting context
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
also thank fuck for strange attractors
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.