okay, but can someone not look at these tendencies to convergence and say, "ugh, let's not do that"?
what is the thing about which i cannot ask "but why do you value this thing over another"?
-
-
There isn't one.
-
okay then, when we get to the thing where the answer is "because i just do", that's the arbitrary value
-
The game I'm playing here is definitional. "any mind asking ought questions"
-
will value what over what?
-
will tier up in meta and probably converge on some final value.
-
To defend moral realism I don't have to defend a specific moral claim.
-
but you do have to defend the claim that there exists such a specific moral claim
-
Sure. But global attractors are not rare. and see https://humaniterations.net/2016/05/16/the-orthogonality-thesis-ontological-crises/ …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.