i don't think it follows that because someone is performing contemplation at depth X they value X+1
i don't think there's any necessary implication of "randomness" rather than a different metastructure
-
-
still pretty sure if we keep pulling back the curtain eventually there's going to be an arbitrary value
-
Why are you sure of this tho?
-
what is the thing about which i cannot ask "but why do you value this thing over another"?
-
There isn't one.
-
okay then, when we get to the thing where the answer is "because i just do", that's the arbitrary value
-
The game I'm playing here is definitional. "any mind asking ought questions"
-
will value what over what?
-
will tier up in meta and probably converge on some final value.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.