Values may converge, but that only implies intersubjectivity and not that morality exists, i.e. that there are objective values.
-
-
The is statement has immediate ought ramifications for anyone already vigilant/reflective.
-
But those who are not vigilant/reflective do not actually face "ought" questions at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
i don't think it follows that because someone is performing contemplation at depth X they value X+1
-
We identify feedbacking dynamics in cognition. Only ever going towards more or less reflection.
-
someone asking an ought question is explicitly taking things a step more meta.
-
okay, but can someone not look at these tendencies to convergence and say, "ugh, let's not do that"?
-
your piece seems to basically just be saying "they won't", but that's way not in evidence
-
Sure someone can definitely look away, but that just means they stopped asking oughts.
-
not that they formulated a different ought? we ought not converge, i will find a way to diverge?
-
Ought? is a question. If you just randomly select an answer you're not asking.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.