hold on, hear me out. Kurt is half right. this kind of engagement is super important, for one reason: sea lioning.https://twitter.com/kurteichenwald/status/798027460801478656 …
-
-
so yes, teams should absolutely be engaging in this fashion. just don't delude yourself that it's for the purpose of getting anything done.
-
it's for the purpose of tying up resources so they can't be put to other uses.
-
i would like to thank the inestimable
@jenphalian for making this point to me, possibly accidentally -
oh my gosh, somebody thought my tactical analysis was good enough to try to dissuade me from it. the critics are literally raving, friends!pic.twitter.com/wL1VxpnToe
-
my favorite part is the idiosyncratic weight on a common word, sufficiently obscurantist as to be indistinguishable from a Dune reference
-
He's talking about the Loyalty, Vouce, Exit paradigm, by some dude whose name i don't remember. Super popular with alt-right
-
thanks! i'd hate to blame Frank Herbert
-
Not Frank Herbert. Man had his problems, but can't blame him for this one!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
piss them off, gain the advantage, *then* engage in activism?
-
oh, do them simultaneously. i mean, an individual should almost certainly specialize in one form of engagement.
-
but this is a great way for people who are physically unable to do street action to contribute, for example.
-
definitely!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
huh. Interesting proposition
-
basically, "tie up their bandwidth..." Have to give that more thought
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.