more that people who pander to a limited pool do better in contexts where that pool is dominant
someone without the chops to trade bon mots with Trump could maybe beat Hlilary just by having lower negatives.
-
-
maybe, but if Trump can undermine them as he did, Hilary's campaign team are going to do the same.
-
true, and i'm not saying i would've bet on any of those jokers up against Hillary, quite frankly.
-
but i don't think it's ridiculous to assign a few of them better chances, and also causing less damage to the party.
-
oh, 100% they'll cause less damage to the party, that's a different issue
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there are a lot of people in this country who would vote for a bowl of lukewarm oatmeal over Hillary.
-
but ask them to choke down something *that* much worse than a bowl of lukewarm oatmeal and they balk.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.