IT HAPPENED TO ME: I Used Object-Oriented Programming Badly And It Didn't Magically Solve My Problems Anyway So It Is Awful Forever
Yeah, trendiness kills. But I kinda just see it as obvious. Packaging state with the code that operates on it? Uh yeah duh
-
-
The current king of trendiness and overpromising is definitely functional programming.
-
agreed, but it's not going mainstream like OO, I don't think.
-
Yeah, there's only so far it's going to go. You can't get real saturation unless the Excel jockeys can successfully misuse it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think most ppl angry at OO actually angry at all the overengineered crap that comes with C++ and Java, not OO per-se.
-
Word. Java is an okay language, Java enterprise-busywork architecture-astronaut culture is a fucking cancer. C++… == C++.
-
Related, soon I'll release my ORM that tightly couples to its DB b/c fuck-you-you-aren't-changing-DBs.pic.twitter.com/o4Vo5B0AVK
-
do your worst, I'm of the "DB is where it all went wrong" pursuasion In the beginning, there was the text file and it was good.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.