"Nothing on-the-record" is certainly not the same thing as "no source".
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime
then cite your source: if it happened, it's interesting. If not, it's a waste of time
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chaosprime
so you refuse to cite a source, but want people to take you seriously? Sorry. That's conspiracy theory garbage. Cite a source
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @warrenmyers
What in the world makes you look at me and say "this person wants to be taken seriously"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
you want to claim "facts" about a political candidate. Yet don't want to share them. Without actual facts & sources, it's trash
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @warrenmyers
So it's trash. No problem. There's no personal brand being built here.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
spreading rumors is sleezy at best. Hillary is a turd - but unsubstantiated rumors do nothing to help anyone's cause
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @warrenmyers
That's what's lovely about providing no confirmation. It does absolutely nothing to help anyone who think it should harm her.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I suppose success at trolling ipso facto identifies one as a troll, regardless of other factors, so sure. YHBT, HTH, HAND.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.