You know how in movies and TV shows people would hush things up because it'd make people panicky, the public couldn't handle knowing?
-
-
got a source? Because that would be exceptionally juicy ... If true
-
Nothing on-the-record. And it'd still be damaging to her to have it confirmed, which is profoundly offensive to me.
-
if there's no source, it is conspiracy fodder. I don't like her or her husband, but sticking with facts is better for everyone.
-
"Nothing on-the-record" is certainly not the same thing as "no source".
-
then cite your source: if it happened, it's interesting. If not, it's a waste of time
-
Shan't.
-
so you refuse to cite a source, but want people to take you seriously? Sorry. That's conspiracy theory garbage. Cite a source
-
What in the world makes you look at me and say "this person wants to be taken seriously"?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
whaaaaaaaat no way
-
totes way
-
was that in the emails or what's the source? not that i don't trust you but yeah
-
not in the emails, i'll DM you
-
I'm curious about this too
-
ermagherd
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I did not but it explains a lot.
-
Presents a model of her fundamental honesty a lot more in keeping with the fact-checking stats than the prevailing view, too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
seriously?!?!
-
Yup. Too bad it'll be a lot longer until we get our first out nonmonogamous president.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mediapathic that could explain so much, I'd love to see some sort of evidence. Sadly, the average person would see it as bad.
-
ban average people 2016
-
If only it were viable to vote third party. Ban First Past The Post Voting 2016!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.