god damn, and i thought i had a jaundiced view of masculinity. you uh in fact like that piece?
yeeeeah... i'd say historically, not inextricably. we can extricate all kindsa shit. but at minimum there's a ton of baggage
-
-
maybe. but aren't you then still defining it in opposition to that historical context?
-
yeah, but is that inextricability? because ferxample then feminism is inextricably bound to racism and that'd be unfortunate
-
it's possible. IMO feminism theoretically only needs to exist in a larger context of oppression.
-
*nod* correspondingly i'd say masculinity and femininity need only provide a social framework for sex-correlated tendencies.
-
(with the proviso here that sex is at least a 16-dimensional phase space not a goddamn bitflag.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.