i mean, i ain't mad or nothin', but it does lend credence to critiques about purity being more important than communication
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime @nberlat
Sometimes people block a person because they say/link to/retweet things the blocker finds upsetting.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Some people block me for reasons unknown. But I don't consider myself entitled to not be blocked.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If my twitter feed bothers people, I feel they have the right not to have to see it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
If only that actually worked! (There is this lady whom i think is a melodramatic shithead but a LOT of
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
What do you mean -- oh well, there is that thing about twitter being broken so if someone retweets a
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GhostCatLady @adrienneleigh and
blocked person's stuff it can be seen by the person who blocks them. But that has nothing to do with it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GhostCatLady @adrienneleigh and
being a person's right to block whoever they want.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
But, back to the topic from my tangent: this woman is trans and precariously homed. If i added her
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
...to a shared blocklist just because i hate her, that would be unjust & people SHOULD hold me to acct.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
i feel like minimum price of entry on this technology should be *revocability* in shared blocklists
-
-
at least then if you made a mistake it isn't literally impossible to undo its consequences
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It does seem to me to be a kind of free-for-all, too easily misused.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.