@t3dy no? sure reads like every other "we can't even get a handle on consciousness as a concept but we're sure machines can't do it" piece
-
-
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime specifically this article reads "there is no reason to believe that it is not solvable by science"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime all it seems to be saying is that not knowing what y is, we can't say x is y1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@t3dy like the headline is figuratively literally "neuroscientist explains how the invisible pink unicorn is not a computer"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime figuratively literally? you seem to be conflating "computer" and "machine"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@t3dy i mean, i'll conflate "machine", "computer", and "human brain", i ain't skeert. not sure why it'd matter if i do1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime
@chaosprime I don't want to interact with people who are abusive and tedious so I have unfollowed and muted your account.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.