@puellavulnerata Many primmies believe civ is 99.99% certain to be doomed. Later collapse means more death + fewer survivors.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata
@puellavulnerata They would retort (and I'd agree) that inaction is also on the causal path. All action or inaction is on causal path.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @puellavulnerata
@puellavulnerata But there ARE a lot of "well it would be computationally intractable to weigh A vs B vs C, so choose whatever!" situations2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rechelon
@rechelon@puellavulnerata does this set up a situation where being bad at predicting outcomes maximizes agency and is therefore desirable?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@rechelon @puellavulnerata deontological equivalent would be talmudic argument where the best outcome is preserving ambiguity (& so choice)
10:56 PM - 13 Mar 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.