@RachelHaywire @semiotechnic the anti-trafficking flag. i mean, it reads like because you accept an unarguable ethical commonplace that…
-
-
-
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic …nobody can argue with without being a fucking monster (children being forced into sex work is bad), you've… - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic okay, that's odd. given everything you know about how people operate, how weird would it be if a compelling… -
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic …new rhetorical element were *not* used as a fig leaf for business as usual?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic of course not. no more than the label "anti-trafficking" should stop analysis of what's being done under it. -
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic i mean, the last thing i expected from you is being unconditionally on-side because someone waved a pretty flag
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@semiotechnic all i'm finding is the tweet where RH caps three Grant tweets that, well, read as perfectly reasonable to me. -
@semiotechnic one in the middle saying that criticizing anti-trafficking policy is conflated with being pro-trafficking, which seems ironic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic when the absence of evidence for your position becomes evidence for your position it might be time to reassess.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RachelHaywire@semiotechnic absolutely. the trouble is the abuse of the anti-trafficking position as a bludgeon. i mean, imo, anyway.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.