They *know*, if they create enough sockpuppets, and harass enough long time editors into losing their cool, they'll get their way.
-
-
Replying to @ChrisWarcraft
.
@ChrisWarcraft Hard not to believe that this isn't what@jimmy_wales ultimately wants. Push a viewpoint, but hands off.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MisterBibs
@MisterBibs@ChrisWarcraft People who create sockpuppets and harass never get their way. That's the worst possible approach.3 replies 13 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @jimmy_wales
@jimmy_wales I would like to agree with you, but Arbcomm just said very much the opposite.4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ChrisWarcraft
@ChrisWarcraft Wikipedia is here to write a neutral and factual description, not to serve as a battleground.13 replies 37 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @jimmy_wales
@jimmy_wales@ChrisWarcraft for years, the way to win WP-as-battleground has been to annoy people until they lose their cool. perfect for GG1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jimmy_wales @ChrisWarcraft "assume good faith" means, to them, "every burner account we make will be permitted to have an impact".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.